New Biden student loan repayment plan enrolls 4 million borrowers McConnell’s health becomes bigger problem for GOP Tropical Storm Lee forecast to become ‘extremely dangerous hurricane’ by. Rep. Ken Buck rips Colorado GOP letter about Jan. In her dissent, liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor argued Monday’s ruling sets a new precedent that “elevates one individual’s interest in personal religious exercise, in the exact time and place of that individual’s choosing, over society’s interest in protecting the separation between church and state.” That case has been scorned by conservatives as biased against religious interests.Ĭourts have long used those precedents to rule on similar cases, so the Supreme Court’s ruling is likely to launch a pathway for new religious policies in public schools. Kurtzman, which created a test to gauge church-state separation policies in public schools. It also brings an end to the 1971 precedent Lemon v. The ruling contrasts with two precedents the Supreme Court issued in the 20th century that prohibited school-sanctioned prayers in the classroom and the reading of the Bible in public schools as part of the wall between church and state. “It just feels good to know that the First Amendment is alive and well,” he said. Kennedy celebrated the win, telling Fox News’s “The Faulkner Focus” that he “can’t stop smiling.”
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |